JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 3, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Luis Miguel Moreno Lopez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el auto del 8 de julio de 2010, proferido por el Magistrado LUIS ERNESTO VARGAS SILVA, mediante el cual se confirmó el rechazo de la acción pública de constitucionalidad, de la referencia.

La Sala concluye que la acción pública estuvo bien rechazada ya que el demandante, planteó una crítica que no es clara en términos idiomáticos y la argumentación no es pertinente ni suficiente, por lo tanto se procede a confirmar el fallo recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el auto del ocho (08) de julio de dos mil diez (2010), proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva, en el sentido de rechazar la demanda interpuesta por Luis Miguel Moreno Lopez contra el articulo 12 (parcial) de la Ley 489 de 1998.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar el contenido de esta decision al recurrente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.